<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are podcasts an efficient means of content delivery?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podcastingapb.thepodcastnetwork.com/2006/06/27/are-podcasts-an-efficient-means-of-content-delivery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podcastingapb.thepodcastnetwork.com/2006/06/27/are-podcasts-an-efficient-means-of-content-delivery/</link>
	<description>Interviews with the leaders of the podcasting industry.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  6 Oct 2008 11:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://podcastingapb.thepodcastnetwork.com/2006/06/27/are-podcasts-an-efficient-means-of-content-delivery/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcastingapb.thepodcastnetwork.com/?p=4#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I find it hard to concentrate on anything else when I'm listening to a podcast. To the point now where I make sure I'm not reading anything too in depth so as to absorb the pod content in its entirity. 95% of the casts I listen to are 100% voice. Problem is, there's often so much I want to read and I find myself able to skim and consume more of what I want when I do. Can't do that with podcasts quite so easily. I've also noticed slow talkers are getting on my nerves. They're the ones I don't go back to unless the content is gold.

I was listening to the gillmor gang the other day and a comment by one of the panel with regard to listening rates when providing a transcript next to the cast was quite interesting. A 225% increase in listeners resulted.
That tells me people are looking for relevent content per podcast and can't be bothered listening through the crap to find out what's on.
Thinking about it, including a seperate "summary" podcast, like a blog post extract, may entice more to listen to the entire cast aswell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard to concentrate on anything else when I&#8217;m listening to a podcast. To the point now where I make sure I&#8217;m not reading anything too in depth so as to absorb the pod content in its entirity. 95% of the casts I listen to are 100% voice. Problem is, there&#8217;s often so much I want to read and I find myself able to skim and consume more of what I want when I do. Can&#8217;t do that with podcasts quite so easily. I&#8217;ve also noticed slow talkers are getting on my nerves. They&#8217;re the ones I don&#8217;t go back to unless the content is gold.</p>
<p>I was listening to the gillmor gang the other day and a comment by one of the panel with regard to listening rates when providing a transcript next to the cast was quite interesting. A 225% increase in listeners resulted.<br />
That tells me people are looking for relevent content per podcast and can&#8217;t be bothered listening through the crap to find out what&#8217;s on.<br />
Thinking about it, including a seperate &#8220;summary&#8221; podcast, like a blog post extract, may entice more to listen to the entire cast aswell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rooster</title>
		<link>http://podcastingapb.thepodcastnetwork.com/2006/06/27/are-podcasts-an-efficient-means-of-content-delivery/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rooster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podcastingapb.thepodcastnetwork.com/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I agree that podcasting and blogs are totally different mediums. I think that people need to also realise that there is an opportunity cost for everything we do. If we read a blog the cost might be that we did not listen to a podcast. If we listen to a podcast we did not watch a TV show. Sure we might be able to do these things later but then there would be an opportunity cost asociated with that as well!

But as far as meduims are concerned chalk and cheese, different and uncomparable.

People saying or implying that they are wasting time listening to podcasts, obviously are not multi-skilled enough to do both at once. Or they just don't get it and should stick to their morning paper... I wonder how they cope when they have an email to reply to and they are reading the RSS feed! They must have palpitations thinking about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that podcasting and blogs are totally different mediums. I think that people need to also realise that there is an opportunity cost for everything we do. If we read a blog the cost might be that we did not listen to a podcast. If we listen to a podcast we did not watch a TV show. Sure we might be able to do these things later but then there would be an opportunity cost asociated with that as well!</p>
<p>But as far as meduims are concerned chalk and cheese, different and uncomparable.</p>
<p>People saying or implying that they are wasting time listening to podcasts, obviously are not multi-skilled enough to do both at once. Or they just don&#8217;t get it and should stick to their morning paper&#8230; I wonder how they cope when they have an email to reply to and they are reading the RSS feed! They must have palpitations thinking about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
